Seven Wishes
More obfuscation in the confusing fiduciary fight over Social Security, made plain by Media Matters (and Atrios--aka Duncan Black--who writes for Media Matters as well) in this coverage of a report from NPR:
Reporting on a town meeting on Social Security reform that Representative Chris Chocola (R-IN) hosted during which a participant suggested that it would be better "to raise the money that people pay into it as they get bigger and bigger salaries," Naylor said, "Chocola says raising or eliminating the cap on earnings that get taxed for Social Security, now $90,000, would only put off the problem." Naylor then played a clip of Chocola stating, "If you eliminate the cap on earnings, so if you made a million dollars a year, you'd pay Social Security taxes on all that million, you would delay the problem by seven years."
As Media Matters previously explained (when The New York Times echoed a similar claim by House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-TX)), this seven-year figure refers only to the effect that lifting the cap would have on the date when the program stops running annual surpluses. Under current law, the Social Security trustees predict that this will occur in 2018; lifting the cap would extend this date to 2025. But this seven-year figure conceals the impact that lifting the cap would have on the real "problem" that Social Security faces: its long-term inability to pay all benefits promised under current law.
The Social Security trustees project
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cec04/cec04fa8bae721811d4a21df2a7a881446339cb1" alt=""
Don't believe the anti-hype.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home